The Solicitor Normal of India, Tushar Mehta, at present took sturdy exception to a information article revealed at present about Sunali Khatun, a pregnant girl, who was deported to Bangladesh on suspicion of being a foreigner, and was later introduced again by the Union Authorities, on humanitarian grounds.
The bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi was listening to a particular go away petition filed by the Union towards the September 27 judgment of the Calcutta Excessive Courtroom, which directed the Authorities to repatriate sure individuals deported to Bangladesh. Final week, following the Courtroom’s suggestion, the Centre had agreed to convey again Sunali Khatun and her son, contemplating that she was pregnant.
In the course of the listening to at present, SG Tushar Mehta, showing for the Union, made severe objections to the information article revealed by The Occasions of India (TOI) this morning concerning the girl.
“There’s a concurrent and simultaneous narrative-building train occurring. I’m positive it doesn’t have an effect on your lordships. There are particular tabloids that are usually identified and used for narrative constructing train. Sadly, at present, to my amazement and shock, I learn a entrance web page story in a good and reliable newspaper like The Occasions of India, it will need to have escaped the editorial consideration.”
The bench mentioned that the judges barely get time to see newspapers, as they’re busy with the issues listed for the day. Justice Bagchi then requested how the article was associated to the current case.
The SG replied that the article was associated to the girl within the case and was revealed on the morning of the day of the listening to. He mentioned that it was,”one thing which can affect/ try to affect this case.”
“TOI, Hindustan Occasions, and Indian Categorical can’t be diminished to the extent of those tabloids, the place you plant tales. It’s for the newspaper to resolve,” the SG added.
The CJI weighed in so as to add : “Two – three issues we advise, (1) by no means write on a subjudice matter, why ought to one create an impression? (2) the peace of mind from the court docket’s aspect that we don’t settle for pleadings that are exterior (the court docket)”
At this juncture, Sr Advocate Sanjay Hegde, showing for a number of deportees, quoted a shayari : “Nahi hai zamana tere ghum ke kabil, tera jawab yahi hai ki tu muskuraye jaaye” (The current instances can not perceive your ache; your solely response ought to be a smile)
The SG replied, “We don’t take issues significantly, we simply snicker it out, after which the Supreme Courtroom of India is mocked.”
The CJI mentioned that any working commentary on pending issues earlier than the Supreme Courtroom shouldn’t be achieved. He added, “As soon as the judgment is handed, any constructive criticism is all the time most welcome.”
Sr Advocate Kapil Sibal, showing for the state of West Bengal, additionally mentioned that one has to simply ignore all of the narratives and counter-narratives which might be occurring. He mentioned attorneys are additionally continually focused in social media. “It occurs to us each day, has my discovered buddy objected to it?” Sibal requested.
Justice Bagchi additionally clarified, “Mr. SG, we’re utterly immune from the makes an attempt of publicity or seeming publicity…narratives mustn’t have an effect on the lives of people.”
The CJI mentioned that reporting of a Courtroom matter mustn’t quantity to thrusting one’s opinion concerning the difficulty. “Reporting a matter, nothing flawed with that, since you are bringing to the general public area that matter, however should you thrust your opinion…”
SG continued,” and attempt to infuse an emotive, which isn’t factually true. And in TOI, we have now authorized journalists who’re so accountable. They write so responsibly that it’s enlightening. This might need escaped the editorial oversight”
Sibal intervened, stating that within the UK, court docket orders develop into part of public discourse. He defined that as a development, any orders that courts at present go are “now a part of international discourse, and so they develop into a topic of a variety of debate.”
He additional added, “So long as you don’t attribute motive, that isn’t sacrilege.”
The bench then proceeded to maintain the matter for sixth January. Hegde knowledgeable the bench that there’s one other case of a deported woman with two youngsters and urged that the Union may additionally contemplate her case, like Sunali Khatun’s.
The CJI requested the Union to think about particular instances of any deportees purely on humanitarian grounds. “Wherever you are feeling that on humanitarian grounds somebody may be thought-about.”
The SG assured the Courtroom, saying, “There isn’t any doubt about it.“
Case Particulars : UNION OF INDIA Versus BHODU SEKH AND ORS.| SLP(Crl) No. 18658/2025
Leave a Reply