He additionally drew consideration to prioritisation of instances the place delay causes deep hurt, resembling these involving life, liberty, and livelihood. He stated that inside per week of assuming workplace, he had directed that every one issues involving pressing interim aid be listed inside two days of curing of defects.
“The concept is straightforward – the place delay causes deep hurt, the system should reply with urgency. Know-how permits that prioritisation by flagging delicate case classes, monitoring pendency in actual time, and guaranteeing clear itemizing protocols,” he stated.
Justice Kant additional noticed that expertise might help strengthen the self-discipline of following precedents – the inspiration of the rule of legislation – by making them accessible, cross-referenced and persistently utilized throughout courts.
“A precedent isn’t merely a previous resolution however the Courtroom’s enduring promise to deal with equals equally. It safeguards judicial conscience and assures each litigant that outcomes movement not from personalities, however from ideas,” he stated.
He additionally urged that judgments have to be written in clear, accessible language, noting that uniformity in judicial expression is important for public belief.
“I’ve come throughout the plight of a number of litigants who stated that though the orders had gone of their favour, they remained not sure of what aid they’d truly secured as a result of the language was too technical or imprecise to grasp,” he stated.
Leave a Reply