It is probably only a matter of time earlier than we see the wisened duo of Rafiki and Jiminy Cricket weilding lightsabers on the icy plains of Arendelle.
That is courtesy of synthetic intelligence, in fact, and a brand new deal between Disney and OpenAI.
OpenAI stated Thursday it had struck a licensing settlement to make use of Disney’s characters and different mental property. Disney may also make investments $1 billion in OpenAI and can buy ChatGPT Enterprise for its workers.
It is a main shift for Disney, which has traditionally been deeply protecting of its mental property. And it is a huge win for OpenAI, which is on a quest for extra content material to feed its AI fashions.
For customers, the deal will allow them to recreate Disney characters on Sora, OpenAI’s short-form video technology app, and to create photographs of Disney characters utilizing ChatGPT.
Past the limitless potentialities for inventive content material, the deal reveals so much about Disney’s technique within the AI age and the affect of synthetic intelligence on the way forward for leisure.
Here is what some sensible folks in media, tech, and enterprise are saying concerning the deal.
Nick Cicero, entrepreneur and digital strategist
For Nick Cicero, the founding father of Delmondo, a social media video analytics firm that was acquired by Conviva in 2018, Disney’s take care of OpenAI is much less about AI and extra about income.
Cicero argued in an X put up on Thursday that Disney was aiming to unravel two “existential” issues: creators utilizing unauthorized Disney content material and youngsters watching YouTube as an alternative of Disney+.
“Sora offers Disney its first scalable solution to pull creator-made content material into its personal premium ecosystem — brand-safe, trackable, authorized, and prepared for CTV monetization,” he stated, referring to the follow of delivering focused promoting to internet-connected televisions.
“This transfer is not about tech,” he added. “It is about income physics.”
Peter Csathy, media marketing consultant
Chatbots like ChatGPT depend on knowledge to energy their outputs, and relating to gathering that knowledge, AI firms are insatiable.
The drive to gather knowledge usually pits AI firms in opposition to content material creators. Quite a few media firms have sued OpenAI, Anthropic, Perplexity, and different main AI outfits for utilizing their copyrighted content material with out permission. Different media firms, like Enterprise Insider’s mum or dad firm, Axel Springer, have struck offers with AI firms to license their content material.
Peter Csathy, a longtime media marketing consultant and analyst, stated Disney’s take care of OpenAI is a “watershed” second for AI and media licensing.
“Now THIS is a generative AI use that is sensible to me and I help,” Csathy wrote on LinkedIn. “Totally licensed characters, thereby respecting copyright and embracing partnership with the inventive neighborhood (reasonably than theft of IP). New income streams for IP rights-holders. And general delight by followers of these beloved characters.”
Caroline Giegerich, AI and advertising and marketing strategist
There are simply so many cease-and-desist letters a media lawyer can ship.
Carline Giegerich, a vice chairman on the Interactive Promoting Bureau who as soon as led rising tech at HBO, says Disney’s take care of OpenAI looks like a “cannot beat ’em, be a part of ’em” second.
“Once I was at HBO from ’05 – ’09, I marveled on the sheer quantity of stop and desists from the authorized workforce when cellular video was up and coming,” she wrote on LinkedIn. “I assumed it appeared tough to combat in opposition to the whole web, and it seems it was. And AI presents an analogous problem.”
She additionally stated the deal presents a useful advertising and marketing alternative for Disney.
“Essential to notice {that a} choice of these fan-created movies will likely be accessible to stream on Disney+. What which means to me is that Disney sees this additionally as a advertising and marketing and content material alternative, which it’s,” she stated.
James Miller, head of enterprise growth at Amazon
Disney’s pivot from aggressively defending its IP at each flip to giving it over to the world’s main AI startup may be strategic for one more cause.
James Miller, the pinnacle of enterprise growth at Amazon for media, leisure, and Amazon Creators, stated he suspects it is a matter of “controlling the inevitable.”
Any IP ultimately enters the general public area. In 2024, the copyright for Mickey Mouse himself — at the very least the sans white gloves model of the Thirties — expired, permitting anybody to make use of his likeness. Winnie the Pooh, Snow White, Cinderella, and a handful of different Disney characters additionally entered the general public area on the identical time.
“By formally licensing these characters now, Disney does three issues,” Miller wrote on LinkedIn. “1. Monetizes the AI pattern reasonably than simply combating it in court docket. 2. Units the standard normal for the way their characters seem in AI video (probably drowning out lower-quality unauthorized variations). 3. Captures knowledge on how followers wish to use their IP earlier than they lose unique rights.”
Karl Haller, accomplice and Shopper Heart of Competency chief at IBM
One shopper professional stated that Disney might need gotten the quick finish of the stick on this partnership.
“Seems to be like OpenAI used the #jedimindwarp on The Walt Disney Firm, not the opposite means round,” Karl Haller, an IBM accomplice and the chief of the agency’s Shopper Heart of Competency, stated in a put up on LinkedIn.
He stated he was “greater than a bit stunned” to see that Disney is letting OpenAI license its IP for Sora and different AI instruments, with a number of the movies being made accessible to stream on Disney+.
“And what does Disney obtain for this? Adverse $1 billion,” he wrote. “Somewhat than receiving a heftly license price, Disney is as an alternative investing $1B in OpenAI and receiving warrants to purchase extra sooner or later.”
Simon Pullman, leisure co-chair at Pryor Cashman
One leisure lawyer identified that the deal comes with lots of unanswered questions.
“It is a pretty beautiful story all spherical with many questions,” Simon Pullman, a accomplice at legislation agency Pryor Cashman, wrote on LinkedIn on Thursday.
“Will audiences need/settle for ‘AI UGC’ on Disney Plus,” he wrote, referring to user-generated content material. “Will it’s attainable for Disney to unring the bell after three years and never prolong the license? How will they shield in opposition to misuse and model harm?”
Mike Walsh, technological change marketing consultant and writer
Disney’s $1 billion wager on AI is the correct transfer for the media big, in accordance with Mike Walsh, the CEO of consulting agency Tomorrow.
“By partnering with OpenAI whereas suing Midjourney and warning Google, Disney is drawing a transparent line,” Walsh wrote on LinkedIn on Thursday. “Remix tradition is not going away, however it will likely be licensed, ruled, and designed on its phrases.”
He added that Disney has all the time survived new media eras with this technique.
“The way forward for leisure belongs to firms that form participation as an alternative of combating it,” he wrote.
Leave a Reply