Enroll right here.
“This motion just isn’t an try and relitigate prior claims,” the brand new lawsuit stated. “It challenges new acts of copying that happen for the primary time in Avatar 2.”
Spokespeople for Disney and Lightstorm didn’t instantly reply to requests for touch upon the grievance on Tuesday.
“The defendants’ alleged misappropriation and downright theft of Mr. Ryder’s protected inventive work to create the third highest-grossing film of all time is blatant and egregious, and it cries out for compensation,” Ryder’s lawyer Daniel Saunders stated in an announcement.
The grievance stated that the “Avatar” sequence, like “KRZ,” consists of “anthropomorphic beings, an enormous oceanic setting, and a sinister, Earth-based company partaking in environmentally dangerous mining operations on the moon of a fuel big planet known as Europa.”
Ryder stated that “The Approach of Water” revolves round “the harvesting of an animal-based substance that when refined can lengthen human life,” a plot level that was featured in “KRZ” however not included within the first “Avatar” film.
“Whereas this animal-based, life-extending substance is only one of many examples of infringing content material in Avatar 2, its use as a foundational plot gadget is central to Defendants’ appropriation,” the lawsuit stated.
The case is Ryder v. Cameron, U.S. District Courtroom for the Central District of California, No. 2:25-cv-11854.
For Ryder: Daniel Saunders of Kasowitz
For Cameron and Disney: lawyer data not but out there
Learn extra:
Reporting by Blake Brittain in Washington
Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Belief Rules.
Leave a Reply