NEW DELHI: The Centre is about to exchange the two-decade-old nationwide rural employment scheme – MGNREGA – with a brand new legislative framework titled the Viksit Bharat Assure for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB-G RAM G) Invoice, 2025. In response to the change, Congress chief Priyanka Gandhi Vadra slammed the federal government questioning the intentions behind eradicating Mahatma Gandhi’s title.The Invoice, aimed toward aligning rural livelihoods with the federal government’s long-term improvement imaginative and prescient, has been listed for introduction within the Lok Sabha, in accordance with the supplementary record of enterprise issued on Monday.
The proposed laws seeks to dismantle MGNREGA, enacted in 2005, and set up a brand new statutory regime for rural employment.Priyanka Gandhi criticises the transferPriyanka Gandhi questioned the federal government’s intent behind renaming the scheme, asking whether or not such a transfer was needed within the first place. Talking to the reporters outdoors the Parliament advanced, she mentioned, “Why is Mahatma Gandhi’s title being eliminated. Mahatma Gandhi is taken into account the tallest chief not simply within the nation however on the planet, so eradicating his title, I actually do not perceive. What’s the goal? What’s their intention?”
.
She additional went on to argue, “At any time when the title of a scheme is modified, there are such a lot of adjustments that need to be made in workplaces, stationery, for which cash is spent. So, what’s the profit? Why is it being completed?”Priyanka Gandhi added that the transfer was wasteful by way of each time and money, and mentioned the Centre was successfully disrupting its personal work by squandering useful debate time. “Even once we are debating, it’s on different points, not the true problems with the individuals. Time is being wasted, cash is being wasted, they’re disrupting themselves,” Priyanka Gandhi added.Final week, when studies surfaced concerning the authorities renaming the scheme to ‘Poojya Bapu Grameen Rozgar Yojana,’ Priyanka Gandhi had mentioned the train can be a waste of presidency assets and questioned what profit the method would serve. “I am unable to perceive what mentality is behind this. First, that is Mahatma Gandhi’s title, and when it’s modified, the federal government’s assets are spent on it once more,” Priyanka Gandhi argued, “From workplaces to stationery, all the pieces needs to be renamed, so this can be a large, expensive course of. So what’s the good thing about doing this unnecessarily? I am unable to perceive.”What adjustments?The federal government would assure 125 days of wage employment each monetary 12 months to every rural family whose grownup members are prepared to undertake unskilled handbook work. That is an improve from the minimal 100 days of wage employment.The invoice positions itself as a part of a broader “rural improvement framework aligned with the nationwide imaginative and prescient of Viksit Bharat 2047”The purpose of MGNREGA framed the programme to “improve the livelihood safety”Whereas the MGNREGA centered on the purpose to “improve the livelihood safety”, the brand new invoice says it goals to advertise “empowerment, development, convergence and saturation for a affluent and resilient rural Bharat”, and lays emphasis on “empowerment, development, convergence and saturation by public works aggregating into forming Viksit Bharat Nationwide Rural Infrastructure Stack”.Within the assertion of objects and causes, rural improvement minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan acknowledged the position performed by MGNREGA during the last 20 years in offering assured wage employment to rural households. Nonetheless, the brand new laws indicators a reimagining of rural employment coverage as the federal government seeks to transition from an entitlement-based security web to what it describes as a future-oriented improvement mission.The VB-G RAM G Invoice would mark the tip of certainly one of India’s most expansive social welfare programmes and the start of a brand new chapter in rural employment coverage, probably reshaping how the state helps livelihoods within the countryside.
Leave a Reply