New Delhi: The Central authorities on Monday rebutted pretend data being circulated on social platforms, claiming that post-retirement advantages, together with dearness allowance (DA) hikes and pay fee revision, will likely be withdrawn below the Finance Act 2025.
“A message circulating on #WhatsApp claims that the Central Authorities has withdrawn post-retirement advantages like DA hikes and Pay Fee revisions for retired workers below the Finance Act 2025. The declare is #FAKE!,” PIB Reality Examine, a fact-checking arm of Press Data Bureau, posted on X social media platform.
Rule 37 of the CCS (Pension) Guidelines, 2021 has been amended to state that if an absorbed PSU worker is dismissed for misconduct, their retirement advantages will likely be forfeited.
Earlier, the Ministry of Finance knowledgeable that the federal government is just not contemplating merging the dearness allowance (DA) of central authorities workers with the essential pay.
With rising hypothesis over the eighth Central Pay Fee, the Centre has clarified that no proposal is at current into consideration to present any interim reduction to the central authorities workers. Whereas replying to a written question within the Lok Sabha, Minister of State for Finance, Pankaj Chaudhary, stated the Centre is just not inspecting any plan to merge the present dearness allowance with primary pay.
“No proposal concerning the merger of the present dearness allowance with the essential is into consideration with the federal government at current,” he said.
Chaudhary was responding to questions that identified that central authorities workers and pensioners have been battling the best ranges of inflation seen in three a long time, arguing that DA and DR revisions are usually not in sync with the present retail inflation.
Worker unions have additionally been demanding the merger of fifty per cent DA with primary pay, all of the extra so after the federal government introduced the phrases of reference for the eighth CPC earlier in November.
(IANS)

Leave a Reply