When All Tech Is Human launched its 2025 Accountable Tech Information, it crystallized one thing I’ve been feeling: the work we’ve been doing on the intersection of know-how and social affect has a reputation, a framework, and an more and more pressing mandate.
Subscribe Now for extra digital improvement reviews
The great information reveals a discipline in speedy maturation—one which ICT4D professionals are already a part of, whether or not we understand it or not.
However there’s a catch: whereas Accountable Tech is shifting from “rising thought” to “established discipline,” it’s additionally fragmenting throughout competing priorities, geographic boundaries, and useful resource constraints that ought to sound acquainted to anybody working in world improvement.
The Company Query
The information opens with a philosophical anchor: the stress between Human Company and Tech Determinism. That is the core query dealing with each digital improvement undertaking. Will we imagine know-how’s trajectory is inevitable (determinism), or can we imagine people can actively form it (company)?
All Tech Is Human firmly stakes its place: “Our tech future occurs BY us, not TO us.”
For ICT4D practitioners deploying digital well being techniques in fragmented healthcare environments or constructing farmer info platforms in low-connectivity contexts, this framing ought to resonate. We’ve by no means had the luxurious of tech determinism. We’ve all the time needed to bend know-how to native realities, not the opposite manner round.
However the information’s survey of 275 practitioners reveals a troubling actuality: the largest concern about AI governance in 2025 isn’t technical functionality—it’s regulatory lag and fragmentation, adopted carefully by political pressures and world governance challenges.
In different phrases, the very contexts the place ICT4D operates.
Intersections We Have to Discover
The information identifies three predominant Accountable Tech disciplines: Accountable AI (RAI), Belief & Security (T&S), and Public Curiosity Expertise (PIT). For improvement practitioners, the intersection of RAI and PIT is the place the motion is.
Each fields emphasize inclusion and hurt discount, significantly for marginalized communities who’re disproportionately impacted by algorithmic techniques. RAI focuses on how we construct AI techniques responsibly; PIT ensures these techniques serve democratic and societal targets.
This isn’t theoretical. Contemplate the AI governance challenges dealing with African international locations: international locations concurrently attempting to leapfrog improvement levels whereas defending residents from algorithmic harms, usually with restricted regulatory capability.
The information notes that whereas Europe leads with frameworks like GDPR and the EU AI Act, the International South faces a capability hole: the harms of know-how are vital, however the assets for enforcement, oversight, and technical experience are restricted.
Expertise Hole as a Recognition Hole
One of many information’s most beneficial contributions is mapping profession pathways. The 2025 careers report reveals that about 75% of jobs labeled “entry-level” in Accountable Tech require prior expertise—a double impossibility that ought to sound acquainted to anybody who’s tried to interrupt into worldwide improvement.
Nonetheless, you doubtless have already got Accountable Tech expertise.
The information identifies “translation”—the flexibility to mix enterprise, moral, technical, and authorized frameworks throughout totally different organizational buildings—because the highest-value ability. Should you’ve ever needed to clarify why a wonderfully useful technical resolution received’t work in a selected cultural context, or navigated donor necessities whereas respecting group wants, you’re already doing this work.
The problem is that ICT4D and Accountable Tech communities aren’t speaking to one another sufficient. The information explicitly notes the necessity to bridge technical and non-technical communities and emphasizes that probably the most urgent challenges can’t be solved from a single vantage level.
Yep, we all know and stay that actuality.
From Ideas to Apply
The information’s case research illustrate why siloed approaches fail. Because the information frames it:
“Thorny tech & society points will not be issues with easy options; they’re systemic challenges with technical, authorized, cultural, and financial roots.”
Accountable Tech isn’t a separate discipline from ICT4D. It’s the identical work with totally different terminology, dealing with parallel challenges at totally different scales. The earlier we acknowledge that, the earlier we are able to share classes, construct coalitions, and be sure that governance frameworks rising in Brussels and Washington truly work in Nairobi and Dhaka.
Our tech future isn’t inevitable. However shaping it requires displaying up. For ICT4D practitioners, this means three sensible shifts:
1. Cease treating “ethics” as a checkbox train.
The information’s survey revealed that the hole between expertise listed in job descriptions and expertise truly wanted is critical—and mushy expertise like “institutional navigation” and “complexity communication” usually matter greater than technical depth.
2. Interact with the rising governance infrastructure.
The information tracks “Moments That Mattered in 2025,” together with the discharge of ISO/IEC 42005:2025 for AI affect assessments and state-level AI laws throughout the U.S. Understanding these frameworks helps place your work strategically.
3. Be a part of the dialog.
All Tech Is Human’s community spans 114 international locations with 50,000+ practitioners. Regional gatherings by means of their ATIHx initiative have emerged in cities from Barcelona to Boston to Philadelphia. The ecosystem exists—it simply wants extra voices from contexts the place know-how’s stakes are highest.
Leave a Reply